so we can agree that otb's actual activity levels were very low right?
5 posters
Page 1 of 1
so we can agree that otb's actual activity levels were very low right?
if you dont count shitstorms OTB was very very slow a solid 93% of the place's activity was shitstorms/conflicts/arguing/bitching/crying
Guest- Guest
Re: so we can agree that otb's actual activity levels were very low right?
who ever disagreed with this?
Re: so we can agree that otb's actual activity levels were very low right?
just making sure[REDACTED] wrote:who ever disagreed with this?
Guest- Guest
Re: so we can agree that otb's actual activity levels were very low right?
OTB: Shitstorms, bitching, people bitching about the bitches, and rd101 being a faggot
L_Clan Ruso- Red Epoch
- Posts : 2618
Join date : 2012-06-18
Age : 26
Location : a/s/l?
Re: so we can agree that otb's actual activity levels were very low right?
ftfyRed Epoch wrote:OTB:Faggotry
Re: so we can agree that otb's actual activity levels were very low right?
OTB's faggotry was fun faggotry though, it was basically a bunch of self destructive retards arguing about how shitty the forum is for hours on end. it was weirdly enjoyable.[REDACTED] wrote:ftfyRed Epoch wrote:OTB:Faggotry
Guest- Guest
Re: so we can agree that otb's actual activity levels were very low right?
Kagiyama wrote:if you dont count shitstorms
mlg broKagiyama wrote:93% of the place's activity was shitstorms
nvidia drivers- Bacon
- Posts : 1207
Join date : 2012-06-18
Age : 104
Location : pillowy mounds of mashed potatoes
Re: so we can agree that otb's actual activity levels were very low right?
>93% of the site's activity was shitstormssmiles all around wrote:Kagiyama wrote:if you dont count shitstormsmlg broKagiyama wrote:93% of the place's activity was shitstorms
>if you don't count shitstorms, the site was very slow
what's the problem
Guest- Guest
Re: so we can agree that otb's actual activity levels were very low right?
the fact that apparently i can't read properlyKagiyama wrote:>93% of the site's activity was shitstormssmiles all around wrote:Kagiyama wrote:if you dont count shitstormsmlg broKagiyama wrote:93% of the place's activity was shitstorms
>if you don't count shitstorms, the site was very slow
what's the problem
nvidia drivers- Bacon
- Posts : 1207
Join date : 2012-06-18
Age : 104
Location : pillowy mounds of mashed potatoes
Re: so we can agree that otb's actual activity levels were very low right?
it was pretty obvious that once they banned you, me, and ratiosu
Queen Kghyilda- Stallionphile Guy
- Posts : 4986
Join date : 2012-06-14
Location : Rsza
Re: so we can agree that otb's actual activity levels were very low right?
it was really stupid
stupid shit like that annoys me
stupid shit like that annoys me
spinnythings- spinnythings
- Posts : 1962
Join date : 2012-06-17
Age : 78
Similar topics
» i think this is the first time we've had significant activity after midnight
» why is there like no activity when most of us are on
» almost no activity today
» so jays forum actually got a bit of activity
» suddenly all activity dies
» why is there like no activity when most of us are on
» almost no activity today
» so jays forum actually got a bit of activity
» suddenly all activity dies
Page 1 of 1
Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
|
|